2024 Foreign Housing Expense Amounts Released, Notice 2024-31 KPMG TaxNewsFlash - United StatesMarch 20, 2024The IRS today released Notice 2024-31 [PDF 156 KB] providing the adjustments to the limitation on housing expenses, under section 911, for specifi...
No Further Funding Cuts For IRS In FY24 Other than a planned repurposing of Inflation Reduction Act supplemental funding, the Internal Revenue Service saw no other cuts as the President signed off on the resolution to keep the federa...
CT - Revision of forms for tobacco products manufacturers announced The annual revision of required forms that must be completed by tobacco products manufacturers and filed with either the Department of Revenue Services or the Office of the Attorney General has been a...
GA - Rural physician tax credit expanded to dentists Georgia has enacted legislation allowing rural dentists as well as rural physicians to receive a $5,000 tax credit for each year they live and practice in a rural Georgia county, up to five years. The...
HI - Affordable housing general excise tax suspension extended Hawaii Gov. Josh Green has issued another proclamation declaring an emergency related to affordable housing. In his Sixth Proclamation Relating to Affordable Housing, he suspends a statutory section r...
ME - Internal revenue code conformity Maine enacted legislation updating its Internal Revenue Code conformity date to December 31, 2023 for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2023. This means that all references to the Internal Re...
NH - Education tax credit scholarship amounts updated New Hampshire has provided annual guidance for the credit for donations to scholarship organizations that may be claimed against the business profits tax and the business enterprise tax. The allowable...
RI - Tax filing and payment deadlines extended Rhode Island has announced that it has extended the deadlines for taxpayers to file returns and pay tax due on April 15, 2024 to July 15, 2024. Taxpayers do not need to file any additional forms or ot...
VT - Local option tax rate changes announced Vermont has announced local option sales tax, local option meals and rooms tax, and alcoholic beverage tax, and local option rooms tax rate changes effective July 1, 2024.Local Option Sales TaxThe fol...
Taxpayers received about $659 million in refunds during fiscal year 2023, representing a 2.7 percent increase in the amount of refunded to taxpayers in the previous fiscal year.
Taxpayers received about $659 million inrefundsduring fiscal year2023, representing a 2.7 percent increase in the amount of refunded to taxpayers in the previous fiscal year.
Therefundswere on nearly $4.7 trillion in gross revenues collected by theInternal Revenue Service, which represents about 96 percent of the funding that supports federal government operations, the agencyreportedin its annualData Bookfor fiscal year2023, which was released April 18, 2024. This is down from more than $4.9 trillion in gross tax revenues inFY2022.
Business income taxes declined in2023to nearly $457 billion inFY2023from nearly $476 billion in the previous fiscal year. Individual and estate and trust income taxes declined to nearly $2.6 trillion from just over $2.9 trillion. Employment taxes, estate and trust taxes, and excise and gift taxes all grew fiscal year-over-year.
More than 271.4 million tax returns and other forms were processed duringFY2023, theIRSreported. Of those, 163.1 million were individual tax returns. Thereportdescribes the2023filing season as"successful".
Paid prepared filed more than 84 million individual tax returns electronically, and taxpayers file nearly 2.9 million returns using theIRSFree File program, the agencyreported.
The Taxpayer Advocate Servicereportedit resolved 219,251 cases inFY2023. The top five case types included:
Processing amended returns (36,171)
Pre-refundwage verification hold (26,052)
Decedent accountrefunds(12,695)
Identity theft (11,915)
Earned Income Tax Credit (10,507)
On the compliance side, theIRSreportedthat for all returns from tax years 2013 through 2021, it examined 0.44 percent of individual returns filed and 0.74 percent of corporate returns filed. Additionally, the agency examined 8.7 percent of taxpayers filing individual returnsreportingtotal positive income of $10 million or more. Isolating tax year 2019 (the most recent year outside the statute of limitations period), the examination rate was 11.0 percent.
InFY2023, theIRSsaid it"closed 582,944 tax return audits, resulting in $31.9 billion in recommended additional tax."Additionally, the agency “completed 2,584 criminal investigations” across three areas:
1,052 illegal-source financial crimes cases
979 legal-source tax crime cases
553 narcotics-related financial crimes cases
On the collections side, theIRSinFY2024 collected more than $104.1 billion in unpaid assessments on returns filed with additional tax due, netting about $68.3 billion after credit transfers. It also assessed more than $25.6 billion in additional taxes for returns not filed timely and collected nearly $2.8 billion with delinquent returns.
The IRS announced that final regulations related to required minimum distributions (RMDs) under Code Sec. 401(a)(9) will apply no earlier than the 2025 distribution calendar year. In addition, the IRS has provided transitionrelief for 2024 for certain distributions made to designated beneficiaries under the 10-year rule. The transitionreliefextends similar relief granted in 2021, 2022, and 2023.
TheIRSannounced that final regulations related torequired minimum distributions(RMDs) underCode Sec. 401(a)(9)will apply no earlier than the 2025 distribution calendar year. In addition, theIRShas providedtransitionrelieffor2024for certain distributions made to designated beneficiaries under the 10-year rule. Thetransitionreliefextendssimilarreliefgranted in 2021, 2022, and 2023.
SECURE Act Changes
The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (SECURE Act) (P.L. 116-94) changed theRMDrules for employees and IRA owners who died after December 31, 2019. UnderCode Sec. 401(a)(9)(H)(i), if an employee in a defined contribution plan or IRA owner has a designated beneficiary, the 5-year distribution period has been lengthened to 10 years, and the 10-year rule applies regardless of whether the employee dies before the required beginning date. Proposed regulations would interpret the 10-year rule to require the beneficiary of an employee who died after his required beginning date to continue to take an annualRMDbeginning in the first calendar year after the employee’s death. This aspect of the 10-year rule differs from the 5-year rule, which required noRMDuntil the end of the 5-year period. Thus, theIRSprovidedtransitionrelieffor 2021, 2022, and 2023.
Guidance for SpecifiedRMDsfor2024
Under thetransitionguidance, a defined contribution plan will not be treated as having failed to satisfyCode Sec. 401(a)(9)for failing to make anRMDin2024that would have been required under the proposed regulations. Thereliefalso applies to an individual who would have been liable for an excise tax underCode Sec. 4974. The guidance applies to any distribution that, under the interpretation included in the proposed regulations, would be required to be made underCode Sec. 401(a)(9)in2024under a defined contribution plan or IRA that is subject to the rules ofCode Sec. 401(a)(9)(H)for the year in which the employee (or designated beneficiary) died if that payment would be required to be made to:
a designated beneficiary of an employee or IRA owner under the plan if the employee or IRA owner died in 2020, 2021, 2022 or 2023, and on or after the employee’s (or IRA owner’s) required beginning date and the designated beneficiary is not using the lifetime or life expectancy payments exception underCode Sec. 401(a)(9)(B)(iii); or
a beneficiary of an eligible designated beneficiary if the eligible designated beneficiary died in 2020, 2021, 2022, or 2023, and that eligible designated beneficiary was using the lifetime or life expectancy payments exception underCode Sec. 401(a)(9)(B)(iii).
Applicability Date of Final Regulations
TheIRShas announced that final regulations regardingRMDsunderCode Sec. 401(a)(9)and related provisions are anticipated to apply for determiningRMDsfor calendar years beginning on or after January 1, 2025.
The IRS, in connection with other agencies, have issued finalrules amending the definition of "short term, limited duration insurance" (STLDI), and adding a notice requirement to fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage, in an effort to better distinguish the two from comprehensive coverage.
The IRS, in connection with other agencies, have issuedfinalrulesamending thedefinitionof"short term, limited duration insurance"(STLDI), and adding a notice requirement to fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage, in an effort to better distinguish the two from comprehensive coverage.
Comprehensive coverage is health insurance which is subject to certain federal consumer protections. BothSTLDIand fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage generally provide limited benefits at lower premiums than comprehensive coverage, and enrollment is typically available at any time rather than being restricted to open and special enrollment periods. However, the government is concerned about the financial and health risks that consumers face if they use either form of coverage as a substitute for comprehensive coverage, particularly as a long-term substitute. Consumers who do not understand key differences betweenSTLDI, fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage, and comprehensive coverage may unknowingly take on significant financial and health risks if they purchaseSTLDIor fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage under the misunderstanding that such products provide comprehensive coverage.
TheDefinitionofSTLDI
STLDIis a type of health insurance coverage sold by health insurance issuers that is primarily designed to fill temporary gaps in coverage that may occur when an individual is transitioning from one plan or coverage to another (for example, due to application of a waiting period for employer coverage). BecauseSTLDIfalls outside of"individual health insurance coverage,"it is generally exempt from the Federal individual market consumer protections and requirements for comprehensive coverage. This can be an issue because individuals who enroll inSTLDIare often not aware that they will not be guaranteed these key consumer protections.
Under thedefinitionin thefinalrules,STLDIis health insurance coverage provided pursuant to a policy, certificate, or contract of insurance that has an expiration date specified in the policy, certificate, or contract of insurance that is no more than three months after the original effective date of the policy, certificate, or contract of insurance, and taking into account any renewals or extensions, has a duration no longer than four months in total. For purposes of thisdefinition, a renewal or extension includes the term of a newSTLDIpolicy, certificate, or contract of insurance issued by the same issuer to the same policyholder within the 12-month period beginning on the original effective date of the initial policy, certificate, or contract of insurance.
STLDIissuers must display a notice on the first page (in either paper or electronic form, including on a website) of the policy, certificate, or contract of insurance, and in any marketing, application, and enrollment materials (including reenrollment materials) provided to individuals at or before the time an individual has the opportunity to enroll or reenroll in the coverage, in at least 14-point font. A sample notice has been provided by the agencies.
Fixed Indemnity Insurance
Federal consumer protections and requirements for comprehensive coverage do not apply to any individual coverage or any group health plan in relation to its provision of certain types of benefits, known as"excepted benefits."Like other forms of excepted benefits, fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage does not provide comprehensive coverage. Rather, its primary purpose is to provide income replacement benefits. Benefits under this type of coverage are paid in a fixed cash amount following the occurrence of a health-related event, such as a period of hospitalization or illness. In addition, benefits are provided at a pre-determined level regardless of any health care costs incurred by a covered individual with respect to the health-related event. Although a benefit payment may equal all or a portion of the cost of care related to an event, it is not necessarily designed to do so, and the benefit payment is made without regard to the amount of health care costs incurred.
In an effort to give consumers an informed choice, thefinalrulesadopt the requirement of a consumer notice that must be provided when offering fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage in the group market and update the existing notice for such coverage offered in the individual market. Thefinalruledoes not address any other provision of the 2023 proposedrules(NPRM REG-120730-21) relating to fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage.
Effective Date
Thefinalrulesapply to newSTLDIpolicies sold or issued on or after September 1, 2024. For fixed indemnity coverage, plans and issuers will be required to comply with the notice provisions for plan years (in the individual market, coverage periods) beginning on or after January 1, 2025.
The Tax Court has ruled against the IRS's denial of a conservation easementdeduction by declaring a Treasury regulation to be invalid under the enactment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
TheTax Courthas ruled against the IRS's denial of aconservation easementdeductionby declaring a Treasuryregulationto beinvalidunder the enactment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
AnLLCconveyed aconservation easementof land to a foundation that was properly registered with the county clerk. The deed conveyed the easement in perpetuity, allowing for extinguishment only in cases where the conservation purposes became impossible to accomplish or if the property were to be condemned by the local government through eminent domain. TheLLCthen timely filed Form 1065,U.S. Return of Partnership Income,claiming a $14.8 milliondeductionunderCode Sec. 170(h)for conveyance of the easement, and included with the return Form 8283,Noncash Charitable Contributions.
The IRS disallowed thedeductionstating the conservation purpose of the easement was not"protected in perpetuity"as required byCode Sec. 170(h)(5)(A)and, specifically, by operation ofReg. § 1.170A-14(g)(6)(ii). TheLLCcontended thatReg. § 1.170A-14(g)(6)(ii)is procedurallyinvalidunder the APA and that the deed therefore need not comply with its requirements.
TheTax Courtdecided to reverse its prior position regarding the validity of thisregulationinOakbrook Land Holdings,LLC,(154TC180,Dec. 61,663; aff’d, CA-6, 2022-1 USTC ¶50,128). Despite the fact the Sixth Circuit affirmed this earlier opinion, the Eleventh Circuit had reversed theTax Courton the same issue. This case is situated in the Tenth Circuit, which had not ruled on this issue.
TheTax Courtagreed with theLLC’s argument thatReg. § 1.170A14(g)(6)(ii) isinvalidbecause the concerns expressed in significant comments filed during the rulemaking process were inadequately responded to by the Treasury Department in the finalregulation’s"basis and purpose"statement, in violation of the APA’s procedural requirements.
Four judges dissented, arguing there is no substantial basis for reversing their opinion of only four years prior, and that invalidating aregulationfor failing to include a statement of basis and purpose should not occur when the basis and purpose are"obvious."
For purposes of the energy investment credit, the IRS released 2024application and allocation procedures for the environmental justice solar and wind capacity limitation under the low-incomecommunitiesbonus credit program. Many of the procedures reiterate the rules in Reg. §1.48(e)-1 and Rev. Proc. 2023-27, but some special rules are also provided.
For purposes of theenergy investment credit, theIRSreleased2024applicationand allocation procedures for the environmental justice solar and wind capacity limitation under thelow-incomecommunitiesbonuscredit program. Many of the procedures reiterate the rules inReg. §1.48(e)-1andRev. Proc. 2023-27, but some special rules are also provided.
TheIRSwill publicly announce the opening and closing dates for the2024Program yearapplicationperiod on the Department of Energy (DOE) landing page for the Program (Program Homepage) athttps://www.energy.gov/justice/low-income-communities-bonus-credit-program. DOE will not accept newapplicationsubmissions for the2024Program year after 11:59 PM ET on the date theapplicationperiod closes. The owner of the solar or wind facility is the person who mustapplyfor an allocation and is the recipient of any awarded allocation.
An applicant mustapplyfor an allocation of Capacity Limitation through DOE online Program portal system (Portal) athttps://eco.energy.gov/ejbonus/s/. Applicants must register in the Portal before they can begin theapplicationprocess; and they must create a login.gov account before accessing the Portal. The Program Homepage includes an Applicant User Guide.
Identifying Category and Sub-Reservation
In addition to the other information detailed below, theapplicationmust identify the relevant facility category:
-- Category 1: Project Located in aLow-IncomeCommunity(and theapplicationmust also specify whether the facility is a behind the meter (BTM) or front of the meter (FTM) facility),
-- Category 2: Project Located on Indian Land,
-- Category 3: QualifiedLow-IncomeResidential Building Project, or
An applicant may submit only oneapplicationfor the2024program year. Thus, if an applicant wishes to change its chosen category (or its Category 1 sub-reservation), it must withdraw its firstapplicationand submit a second one. Otherwise, anyapplicationsubmitted after the firstapplicationis treated as a duplicateapplication.
ApplicationContents
Theapplicationmust contain all required information, documentation, and attestations submitted under penalties of perjury by a person who has personal knowledge of the relevant facts. That person must also be legally authorized to bind the applicant entity for federal income tax purposes, to communicate with DOE about theapplication, and to receive notifications, letters, and other communications from DOE and theIRS.
The guidancedetailsthe required information regarding the applicant and the facility, as well as the required documentation. The guidance also describes the information that must be submitted if an applicant wants to be considered under the additional ownership criteria or the additional geographic criteria. The DOE may require additional information in its publicly available written procedures.
DOE Review and Selection
DOE will reviewapplicationsand provide a recommendation to theIRS. If the DOE identifies an error in theapplication, such as missing or incorrect information or documentation, it will notify the applicant through the Portal. The applicant will have 12 business days to correct the information; otherwise, DOE will treat theapplicationas withdrawn.
Once theapplicationperiod opens for the2024Program year, allapplicationssubmitted during the first 30 days are treated as submitted at the same time. DOE will publicly announce on the Program Homepage the opening and closing dates of this 30-day period. Ifapplicationsduring this period exhaust the available allocation for a category, DOE will conduct an allocation lottery. After the 30-day period, DOE will reviewapplicationsin the order they are submitted until the available capacity in the identified category is allocated.
Receiving an Allocation and Claiming theBonusCredit
After theIRSreceives the DOE recommendation, it will award an allocation or reject theapplication. TheIRSwill send final decision letters through the Portal, which will identify the amount of any allocation awarded. However, an allocation is not a final determination that the facility is eligible for thebonuscredit.
The owner of a facility that receives an allocation must use the Portal to report the date the facility is placed in service. The guidancedetailsthe additional information the owner must provide with the notification. After the facility is placed in service, and the owner submits the additional documentation and attestations, the owner is notified that it may claim thebonuscredit.
After theIRSawards all the Capacity Limitation within each facility category, or the2024Program year is closed, DOE will stop reviewingapplications. At the end of the2024Program year, no further action will be taken onapplicationsthat were not awarded an allocation. DOE will publicly announce on the Program Homepage when the2024Program year closes.
Effect on Other Documents
Rev. Proc. 2023-27, I.R.B. 2023-35, 655, is superseded solely with respect to the2024program year.
The IRS has provided a limited waiver of the addition to tax under Code Sec. 6655 for underpayments of estimated income taxrelated to application of the corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT), as amended by the Inflation Reduction Act (P.L. 117-169).
TheIRShas provided a limitedwaiverof theaddition to taxunderCode Sec. 6655forunderpaymentsofestimated income taxrelatedto application of thecorporate alternative minimum tax(CAMT), as amended by the Inflation Reduction Act (P.L. 117-169).
The Inflation Reduction Act added a newcorporate AMTunderCode Sec. 55, beginning after December 31, 2022, based on acorporation's adjusted financial statement income.Code Sec. 6655generally requirescorporationsto payestimated income taxesquarterly, with anaddition to taxfor failure to make sufficient and timely payments. The quarterlyestimated tax paymentsmust add up to 100 percent of the income tax due.
Estimated Taxes
TheIRSwaivedtheaddition to taxunderCode Sec. 6655that is attributable to acorporation’sCAMTliability for the installment ofestimated taxthat is due on or before April 15, 2024, or May 15, 2024 (in the case of a fiscal year taxpayer with a taxable year beginning in February 2024). Accordingly, a corporate taxpayer’s required installment ofestimated taxthat is due on or before April 15, 2024, or on or before May 15, 2024 (in the case of a fiscal year taxpayer with a taxable year beginning in February 2024), need not include amounts attributable to itsCAMTliability underCode Sec. 55to prevent the imposition of anaddition to taxunderCode Sec. 6655. However, if acorporationfails to pay itsCAMTliability, other Code sections may apply. For instance,additions to taxunderCode Sec. 6651could be imposed.
Instructions to Form 2220
The instructions to Form 2220,UnderpaymentofEstimated TaxbyCorporations, will be modified to clarify that noaddition to taxwill be imposed underCode Sec. 6655based on acorporation’s failure to makeestimated tax paymentsof itsCAMTliability for any coveredCAMTyear. Taxpayers may exclude such amounts when calculating the amount of its required annual payment on Form 2220. Affected taxpayers must still file Form 2220 with their income tax return, even if they owe noestimated taxpenalty.
Applicability Date
Thewaiverof theaddition to taximposed byCode Sec. 6655applies to the installment ofestimated taxthat is due on or before April 15, 2024, or on or before May 15, 2024 (in the case of a fiscal year taxpayer with a taxable year beginning in February 2024).
The IRS has issued proposedregulations that would provideguidance on the application of the new excise tax on repurchases of corporate stock made after December 31, 2022 (NPRMREG-115710-22). Another set of proposed rules would provideguidance on the procedure and administration for the excise tax (NPRMREG-118499-23).
The IRS has issuedproposedregulationsthat wouldprovideguidanceon the application of the newexcise taxonrepurchasesof corporatestockmade after December 31, 2022 (NPRMREG-115710-22). Another set ofproposedrules wouldprovideguidanceon the procedure and administration for theexcise tax(NPRMREG-118499-23).
Code Sec. 4501 and IRSGuidance
Beginning in 2023,Code Sec. 4501subjects a covered corporation to anexcise taxequal to one percent of the fair market value of itsstockthat is repurchased by the corporation during the tax year. Acovered corporationfor this purpose is any domestic corporation thestockof which is traded on an establishedsecuritiesmarket.
Repurchaseincludesstockredemptions and economically similar transactions as determined by the IRS. The amount of repurchase subject to the tax is reduced by the value of newstockissued to the public or employees during the year. Repurchase of the covered corporation’sstockby its specified affiliate (a more-than-50-percent owned domestic subsidiary or partnership) also subjects the covered corporation to theexcise tax.
Theexcise taxdoes not apply if the total amount ofstockrepurchasesduring the year is less than $1 million and in certain other situations.
Notice 2023-2, 2023-3 I.R.B. 374, provides initialguidanceregarding the application of theexcise tax. It describes rules expected to be provided in forthcomingproposedregulationsfor determining the amount ofstockrepurchaseexcise taxowed, along with anticipated rules for reporting and paying any liability for the tax.
ProposedOperative Rules under Code Sec. 4501 (NPRMREG-115710-22)
Theproposedregulationswouldprovidegeneral rules regarding the application and computation of thestockrepurchaseexcise tax, the statutory exceptions, and the application ofCode Sec. 4501(d). Specifically, theproposedregulationswouldprovideguidanceaddressing the following:
Certain issues related to the effective date and transition relief, including:
repurchasesbefore January 1, 2023, are not taken into account for purposes of applying the de minimis exception;
in the case of a covered corporation that has a tax year that both begins before January 1, 2023, and ends after December 31, 2022, that covered corporation may apply the netting rule to reduce the fair market value of the covered corporation’srepurchasesduring that tax year by the fair market value of all issuances of itsstockduring the entirety of that tax year;
contributions to an employer-sponsored retirement plan during the 2022 portion of a tax year beginning before January 1, 2023, and ending after December 31, 2022, should be taken into account for purposes ofCode Sec. 4501(e)(2);
the date of repurchase for a regular-way sale ofstockon an establishedsecuritiesmarket is the trade date.
Definition ofstockand the application of theexcise taxto various types ofstock, options, and financial instruments. Theproposedregulationsgenerally would maintain the definition of"stock"fromNotice 2023-2, but would exclude"additional tier 1 preferredstock"; therefore, unless the limited-scope exception regarding additional tier 1 preferredstockapplies, thestockrepurchaseexcise taxwould apply to preferredstockin the same manner as to commonstock.
Rules for valuation ofstock. Generally, theproposedregulationswould adopt the valuation approach ofNotice 2023-2that the fair market value ofstockrepurchased or issued is the market price of thestockon the date thestockis repurchased or issued, respectively.
Rules for timing of issuances andrepurchases. The approach thatstockgenerally should be treated as repurchased when tax ownership of thestocktransfers to the covered corporation or to the specified affiliate (as appropriate) would generally be retained.
Rules regarding becoming or ceasing to be a covered corporation and determining specified affiliate status.
Rules regardingCode Sec. 301distributions, and complete and partial liquidations.
Treatment of taxable transactions, including LBOs and other taxable"take private"transactions.
Application of the statutory exceptions, including repurchase as part of a reorganization, contributions to employer-sponsored retirement plans, the de minimis exception,repurchasesby dealers insecurities,repurchasesby RICs and REITs, and the dividend exception.
Application of the netting rule (the adjustment forstockissued by a covered corporation, includingstockissued or provided to employees of a covered corporation or its specified affiliate).
Considerations for mergers and acquisitions with post-closing price adjustments and troubled companies.
Theproposedregulations, other than theproposedregulationsunderCode Sec. 4501(d), would generally apply torepurchasesofstockof a covered corporation occurring after December 31, 2022, and during tax years ending after December 31, 2022, and to issuances and provisions ofstockof a covered corporation occurring during tax years ending after December 31, 2022. However, certain rules that were not described in Notice 2023-2 would apply torepurchases, issuances, or provisions ofstockof a covered corporation occurring after April 12, 2024, and during tax years ending after April 12, 2024.
Except as described below, so long as a covered corporation consistently follows the provisions of theproposedregulations, the covered corporation may rely on theseproposedregulationswith respect to (1)repurchasesofstockof the covered corporation occurring after December 31, 2022, and on or before the date of publication of finalregulationsin the Federal Register, and (2) issuances and provisions ofstockof the covered corporation occurring during tax years ending after December 31, 2022, and on or before the date of publication of finalregulationsin the Federal Register.
In addition, so long as a covered corporation consistently follows the provisions of Notice 2023-2 corresponding to the rules in theproposedregulations, the covered corporation may choose to rely on Notice 2023-2 with respect to (1)repurchasesofstockof a covered corporation occurring after December 31, 2022, and on or before April 12, 2024, and (2) issuances and provisions ofstockof a covered corporation occurring during taxable years ending after December 31, 2022, and on or before April 12, 2024.
A covered corporation that relies on the provisions of Notice 2023-2 corresponding to theproposedrules with respect to (1)repurchasesoccurring after December 31, 2022, and on or before April 12, 2024, and (2) issuances and provisions ofstockof a covered corporation occurring during tax years ending after December 31, 2022, and on or before April 12, 2024, may also choose to rely on the provisions of theproposedregulationswith respect to (1)repurchasesoccurring after April 12, 2024, and on or before the date of publication of finalregulationsin the Federal Register, and (2) issuances and provisions ofstockof a covered corporation occurring after April 12, 2024, and on or before the date of publication of finalregulationsin the Federal Register.
Special applicability dates are provided for theproposedrules underCode Sec. 4501(d).
Rules Regarding Procedure and Administration (NPRMREG-118499-23)
The IRS has alsoproposedregulationswithguidanceon the manner and method of reporting and paying thestockrepurchaseexcise tax. Theseproposedregulationsproviderequirements for return and recordkeeping, the time and place for filing the return and paying the tax, and tax return preparers.
Consistent with Notice 2023-2, theproposedregulationsadd rules on procedure and administration inproposedsubpart B of theproposedStockRepurchaseExcise TaxRegulations(26 CFR part 58) underCode Secs. 6001,6011,6060,6061,6065,6071,6091,6107,6109,6151,6694,6695, and6696.
In addition to requiring theexcise taxto be reported on IRS Form 720, Quarterly FederalExcise TaxReturn, theproposedregulationsinclude items relevant to tax forms other than Form 720 (such as Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return, and Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income) to assist in identifying transactions subject to the tax.
Applicability Date ofProposedProcedural Rules
ProposedReg. §58.6001-1would be applicable torepurchases, adjustments, or exceptions required to be shown in anystockrepurchaseexcise taxreturn required to be filed after the date of publication of finalregulationsin the Federal Register.
The rest of theproposedregulationswould be applicable tostockrepurchaseexcise taxreturns and claims for refund required to be filed after the date of publication of finalregulationsin the Federal Register.
Effect on Other Documents
Notice 2023-2, 2023-3 I.R.B. 374, is obsoleted forrepurchases, issuances, and provisions ofstockof a covered corporation occurring after April 12, 2024.
Requests for Comments
Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing with respect to theproposedoperative rules must be received by the date that is 60 days after April 12, 2024, the date of publication in the Federal Register. Comments and requests for a public hearing on theproposedprocedural rules must be received by the date that is 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
One morning you reach into your mailbox or bin to find the dreaded letter from the IRS announcing that you owe unpaid taxes. As if that wasn't enough to induce panic, you may discover there are add-on charges for interest and penalties. Penalties for what, you may ask?
One morning you reach into your mailbox or bin to find the dreaded letter from the IRS announcing that you owe unpaid taxes. As if that wasn't enough to induce panic, you may discover there are add-on charges for interest and penalties. Penalties for what, you may ask?
If you violate the Tax Code, the IRS may impose civil and/or criminal penalties, depending on the type of infraction committed. Civil penalties are commonly imposed for a failure to pay taxes when due, failure to report the correct amount of tax owed, a failure to deposit federal tax deposits, filing late, or even failing to pay because of a bounced check. There are more than 100 kinds of civil penalties in the Tax Code, ranging in severity. For example, a penalty for failure to file (separate and apart from a failure to pay) carries a minimum $100 fine, while a penalty for valuation overstatement can result in a 30 percent penalty on the amount of tax owed as a result. Criminal penalties can be even more severe, and may include terms of imprisonment as well as fines.
Taxpayers, return preparers, and third parties with some connection to the tax return in question may all become subject to penalties. Common civil penalties include failure to file tax returns, failure to pay taxes due, underpaying tax due to negligence, and valuation misstatements that result in inaccurate reporting of income (and therefore an incorrect amount of tax owed).
Criminal penalties are imposed for violations of federal Tax Code and Criminal Code, which include the willful (or intentional) attempt to evade or defeat any federal tax, the failure to collect or truthfully account for and pay any federal tax as required, or the failure to keep required records, supply required information or make required returns. Generally the IRS Criminal Investigations Division will conduct investigations into allegations of criminal tax violations, and if it recommends that the government prosecuted, the case could be referred to the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, the Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney's Office, or some combination of the three.
Hopefully you will never receive a letter from the IRS about either civil or criminal penalties. But if you do, please call our offices with any questions.
When starting a business or changing an existing one there are several types of business entities to choose from, each of which offers its own advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the size of your business, one form may be more suitable than another. For example, a software firm consisting of one principal founder and several part time contractors and employees would be more suited to a sole proprietorship than a corporate or partnership form. But where there are multiple business members, the decision can become more complicated. One form of business that has become increasingly popular is called a limited liability company, or LLC.
When starting a business or changing an existing one there are several types of business entities to choose from, each of which offers its own advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the size of your business, one form may be more suitable than another. For example, a software firm consisting of one principal founder and several part time contractors and employees would be more suited to a sole proprietorship than a corporate or partnership form. But where there are multiple business members, the decision can become more complicated. One form of business that has become increasingly popular is called a limited liability company, or LLC.
The LLC combines several favorable characteristics of a traditional partnership, in which all members are entitled to participate in the management and operation of the business, with those of a corporation, in which the owners, directors, and shareholders are generally shielded from liability for the corporation's debts. The means that in an LLC, just as in a corporation, the personal assets of the business owners' would generally be protected if the business failed, lost a lawsuit, or faced some other catastrophe. Members are only liable to the extent of their capital contribution to the business. In addition, members can fully participate in the management of the business without endangering their limited liability status.
When filing season begins, the profits (or losses) from the LLC pass through to its members, who pay tax on any income when filing their individual returns. In other words, income from the LLC is taxed at the individual tax rates. Income from corporations, on the other hand is taxed twice, once at the corporate entity level and again when distributed to shareholders. Because of this, more tax savings often results if a business formed as an LLC rather than a corporation.
Taxpayers should note, however, that Congress recently increased the top marginal individual income tax rate to 39.6 percent, has placed a .09 percent additional Medicare tax on wages over $200,000 (single taxpayers), and has imposed a 3.8 percent net investment income tax on higher-income taxpayers. At the same time, there is strong talk among members of both political parties of lowering the corporate rate from the current 35 percent to something around 28 or 25 percent to make the United States more competitive with foreign nations. If this happens, many highly profitable LLC businesses may need to rethink their situation and consider switching to a corporate form.
Forming an LLC involves many requirements, but the benefits can be substantial. Please call our offices if you have any questions.
The IRS has announced a new optional safe harbor method, effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, for individuals to determine the amount of their deductible home office expenses (IR-2013-5, Rev. Proc. 2013-13). Being hailed by many as a long-overdue simplification option, taxpayers may now elect to determine their home office deduction by simply multiplying a prescribed rate by the square footage of the portion of the taxpayer's residence used for business purposes.
The IRS has announced a new optional safe harbor method, effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, for individuals to determine the amount of their deductible home office expenses (IR-2013-5, Rev. Proc. 2013-13). Being hailed by many as a long-overdue simplification option, taxpayers may now elect to determine their home office deduction by simply multiplying a prescribed rate by the square footage of the portion of the taxpayer's residence used for business purposes.
The IRS cites that over three million taxpayers in recent tax years have claimed deductions for business use of a home, which normally requires the taxpayer to fill out the 43-line Form 8829. Under the new procedure, a significantly simplified form is used. The new method is expected to reduce paperwork and recordkeeping for small businesses by an estimated 1.6 million hours annually, according to the IRS. The new optional deduction is limited to $1,500 per year, based on $5 per square foot for up to 300 square feet.
The simplified method is not effective for 2012 tax year returns being filed during the current 2013 filing season, but it will become effective for 2013 tax year returns filed in 2014. Taxpayers may want to investigate now whether they could benefit from the election for the 2013 tax year. Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller advised upon announcement of the safe harbor that "The IRS … encourages people to look at this option as they consider tax planning in 2013." A final decision on the election need not be made until 2014, when 2013 returns are filed.
Basic home office deduction rule
Under Code 280A, which governs the home office deduction rules on the simplified method election, a taxpayer may deduct expenses that are allocable to a portion of the dwelling unit that is exclusively used on a regular basis. This generally means usage as:
The taxpayer's principal place of business for any trade or business
A place to meet with the taxpayer's patients, clients, or customers in the normal course of the taxpayer's trade or business, or
In the case of a separate structure that is not attached to the dwelling unit, in connection with the taxpayer's trade or business.
The new simplified method does not remove the requirement to keep records that prove exclusive use, on a regular basis, for one of the three designated uses listed above. It does help, however, in other ways.
Simplified safe harbor
Using the new simplified safe harbor method, a taxpayer determines the amount of deductible expenses for qualified business use of the home for the tax year by multiplying the allowable square footage by the prescribed rate. The allowable square footage is the portion of a home used in a qualified business use of the home, but not to exceed 300 square feet. The prescribed rate is $5.00 per square foot.
Taxpayers who itemize their returns and use the safe harbor method may also deduct, to the extent allowed by the Tax Code and regs, any expense related to the home that is deductible without regard to whether there is a qualified business use of the home for that tax year, the IRS explained. As a result, they will be able to claim allowable mortgage interest, real estate taxes, and casualty losses on the home as itemized deductions on Schedule A of Form 1040. These deductions do not need to be allocated between personal and business use, as is required under the regular method.
Depreciation
Taxpayers using the safe harbor cannot deduct any depreciation for the portion of the home that is used in a qualified business use of the home for that tax year. For many taxpayers, depreciation is the largest component of the home office deduction under the regular method that must be sacrificed if the new safe harbor method is used. Depending upon the value of your home and the space devoted to an office at home, using the regular method may prove to be the far better choice than electing the simplified method.
Election
Taxpayers may elect from tax year to tax year whether to use the safe harbor method or actual expense method. Once made, an election for the tax year is irrevocable. The IRS has provided rules for calculating the depreciation deduction if a taxpayer uses the safe harbor for one year and actual expenses for a subsequent year. The deduction of expenses that are not related to the home, such as wages and supplies, is unaffected and those deductions are still available to those using the new method.
Limitations
The IRS set various limits on the safe harbor, including:
Taxpayers with more than one qualified business use of the same home for a tax year and who elect the safe harbor must use the safe harbor for each qualified business use of the home.
Taxpayers with qualified business uses of more than one home for a tax year may use the safe harbor for only one home for that tax year.
A taxpayer who has a qualified business use of a home and a rental use of the same home cannot use the safe harbor for the rental use.
If you are currently claiming a home office deduction, or if you have considered taking the deduction in the past but were discouraged by all of the paperwork and calculations required, you should consider whether the new, simplified safe harbor method is right for you. Please feel free to contact this office for further details.
Under the new health care law, starting in 2014, "large" employers with more than 50 full-time employees will be subject to stiff monetary penalties if they do not provide affordable and minimum essential health coverage. With less than eleven months before this "play or pay" provision is fully effective, the IRS continues to release critical details on what constitutes an "applicable large employer," "full-time employee," "affordable coverage," and "minimum health coverage." Most recently, the IRS issued proposed reliance regulations that provide employers with the most comprehensive explanation of their obligations and options to date.
Under the new health care law, starting in 2014, "large" employers with more than 50 full-time employees will be subject to stiff monetary penalties if they do not provide affordable and minimum essential health coverage. With less than eleven months before this "play or pay" provision is fully effective, the IRS continues to release critical details on what constitutes an "applicable large employer," "full-time employee," "affordable coverage," and "minimum health coverage." Most recently, the IRS issued proposed reliance regulations that provide employers with the most comprehensive explanation of their obligations and options to date.
Background
Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) the federal government has made it possible for certain workers who do not otherwise have access to affordable health insurance coverage to obtain a tax credit that would help them pay the costs of their health care premiums. This credit applies to low-income workers whether employed by a small, mid-size or large employer or self-employed. Under Code Sec. 4980H as added by the PPACA, however, an "applicable large employer" is subject to a shared responsibility payment (an assessable payment) after December 31, 2013 if any of its full-time employees are certified to receive an applicable premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction and either:
The employer does not offer to its full-time employees and their dependents the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan (Code Sec. 4980H(a)); or
The employer offers its full-time employees and their dependents the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan that with respect to a full-time employee who has been certified for the advance payment of an applicable premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction either is unaffordable relative to an employee's household income or does not provide minimum value (Code Sec. 4980H(b)).
The Code Sec. 4980H(b) penalty applies to coverage that is "unaffordable," meaning that the coverage costs more than 9.5 percent of the employee's household income. Since employers may not be able to determine household income, the proposed regs provide three affordability safe harbors: the Form W-2 safe harbor (based on employee wages); the rate of pay safe harbor (based on hourly or monthly pay rates); and the federal poverty line safe harbor, the IRS explained.
The employer cannot be liable under both Code Secs. 4980H(a) and 4980H(b). Furthermore, the penalty cannot exceed the payment amount that would have been imposed under Code Sec. 4980H(a) if the employee had failed to offer coverage to its full-time employees.
Proposed reliance regs
The proposed reliance regs further clarify what employees are considered "full-time employees" for the purpose of the statute. This distinction is important because the number of full-time employees determines who is an applicable large employer, subject to the affordable coverage requirements and, potentially, the per-employee shared responsibility payment. The proposed reliance regs provide additional guidance on who is a full-time employee, and covers gray areas such as the treatment of seasonal employees.
Other guidance under the regs covers whether employers who have only become applicable large employers in the current year are exempt from the shared responsibility payment. (Generally, they are not.) The proposed reliance regulations also provide certain relief to employers who inadvertently miss some employees.
Finally, the proposed reliance regs provide several transition rules. A major rule allows employers with plans on a fiscal year to wait to apply the standards until the first day of the first plan year that begins in 2014. Another rule exempts employers from penalties in 2014 if they must add dependent coverage to their health plans. Other transition rules apply to health plans offered through cafeteria plans and multiemployer plans. In addition, there are many notification responsibilities that will be placed upon the shoulders of all employers regarding access by their employees to health insurance.
If you have questions about the health care requirements for employers, the shared responsibility payment under Code Sec. 4980H, or anything related to the tax provisions of the new health care law, please contact our offices.
Beginning in 2013, the capital gains rates, as amended by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, are as follows for individuals:
Beginning in 2013, the capital gains rates, as amended by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, are as follows for individuals:
A capital gains rate of 0 percent applies to the adjusted net capital gains if the gain would otherwise be subject to the 10 or 15 percent ordinary income tax rate.
A capital gains rate of 15 percent applies to adjusted net capital gains if the gain would otherwise be subject to the 25, 28, 33, or 35 percent ordinary income tax rate.
A capital gains rate of 20 percent applies to adjusted net capital gains if the gain would otherwise be subject to the 39.6 percent ordinary income tax rate beginning after December 31, 2012.
Individuals are subject to the 39.6 percent ordinary income tax rate beginning in 2013 to the extent their taxable income exceeds the applicable threshold amount of $450,000 for married individuals filing joint returns and surviving spouses, $425,000 for heads of households, $400,000 for single individuals, and $225,000 for married individuals filing separate returns.
Comment: The only change from 2012 rates is the 20 percent rate, applied as described, above. Prior to 2013, the highest tax rate on net capital gain was 15 percent.
Comment: Adjusted net capital gain is net capital gain from capital assets held for more than one year other than unrecaptured Code Sec. 1250 gain (25 percent); collectibles gain (28 percent) or gain from qualified small business stock (varying rates).
Examples
Following the rules outlined above, computations for higher-income taxpayers (those whose taxable income together with net capital gains exceed the 39.6 percent tax bracket threshold amounts, which are also the threshold amounts for the 20 percent capital gain rate) are illustrated under three scenarios:
Example 1: Assume in 2013, joint filers with $475K in net capital gain and $200K in ordinary income:
$200K ordinary income will be taxed under the regular income tax tables, which for 2013 indicate a $43,465.50 tax.
$475K capital gain is taxed:
$250K of $475 net capital gain at 15 percent ($450K threshold less $200K ordinary income) = $37,500
The remainder of the net capital gain $225K ($475K less $250K that was taxed at 15 percent) is taxed at 20 percent = $45,000
Total tax liability: $43,465.50 on $200K ordinary income and $82,500 on $475K net capital gain.
Example 2: Assume in 2013, joint filers with $200K in net capital gain and $475K in ordinary income:
$475K ordinary income will be taxed under the regular income tax tables, which for 2013 indicate a $135,746 tax.
$200K capital gain is taxed:
All of $200K net capital gain at 20 percent ($450K threshold already exceeded by $475K in ordinary income) = $40,000.
Total tax liability: $135,746 on $475K ordinary income and $40,000 on $200K net capital gain.
Example 3: Assume in 2013, joint filers with $50K ordinary income and $425K in net capital gain:
$50K ordinary income will be taxed under the regular income tax tables, which for 2013 indicate a $4,845
$425K net capital gain is taxed:
$20,700 at zero percent ($70,700, which is the top of the 15 percent bracket less $50K ordinary income) = $0
$379,300 at 15 percent ($450,000 less $70,700) = $56,895
$25,000 at 20 percent (balance of ordinary income plus capital gain over $450K threshold) = $5,000.
Total tax liability: $4,845 on $50K ordinary income and $40,000 on $200K net capital gain.
In recent years, the IRS has been cracking down on abuses of the tax deduction for donations to charity and contributions of used vehicles have been especially scrutinized. The charitable contribution rules, however, are far from being easy to understand. Many taxpayers genuinely are confused by the rules and unintentionally value their contributions to charity at amounts higher than appropriate.
In recent years, the IRS has been cracking down on abuses of the tax deduction for donations to charity and contributions of used vehicles have been especially scrutinized. The charitable contribution rules, however, are far from being easy to understand. Many taxpayers genuinely are confused by the rules and unintentionally value their contributions to charity at amounts higher than appropriate.
Vehicle donations
According to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), there are approximately 250 million registered passenger motor vehicles in the United States. The U.S. is the largest passenger vehicle market in the world. Potentially, each one of these vehicles could be a charitable donation and that is why the IRS takes such a sharp look at contributions of used vehicles and claims for tax deductions. The possibility for abuse of the charitable contribution rules is large.
Bona fide charities
Before looking at the tax rules, there is an important starting point. To claim a tax deduction, your contribution must be to a bona fide charitable organization. Only certain categories of exempt organizations are eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions.
Many charitable organizations are so-called “501(c)(3)” organizations (named after the section of the Tax Code that governs charities. The IRS maintains a list of qualified Code Sec. 501(c)(3) organizations. Not all charitable organizations are Code Sec. 501(c)(3)s. Churches, synagogues, temples, and mosques, for example, are not required to file for Code Sec. 501(c)(3) status. Special rules also apply to fraternal organizations, volunteer fire departments and veterans organizations. If you have any questions about a charitable organization, please contact our office.
Tax rules
In past years, many taxpayers would value the amount of their used vehicle donation based on information in a buyer’s guide. Today, the value of your used vehicle donation depends on what the charitable organization does with the vehicle.
In many cases, the charitable organization will sell your used vehicle. If the charity sells the vehicle, your tax deduction is limited to the gross proceeds that the charity receives from the sale. The charitable organization must certify that the vehicle was sold in an arm’s length transaction between unrelated parties and identify the date the vehicle was sold by the charity and the amount of the gross proceeds.
There are exceptions to the rule that your tax deduction is limited to the gross proceeds that the charity receives from the sale of your used vehicle. You may be able to deduct the vehicle’s fair market value if the charity intends to make a significant intervening use of the vehicle, a material improvement to the vehicle, or give or sell the vehicle to a qualified needy individual. If you have any questions about what a charity intends to do with your vehicle, please contact our office.
Written acknowledgment
The charitable organization must give you a written acknowledgment of your used vehicle donation. The rules differ depending on the amount of your donation. If you claim a deduction of more than $500 but not more than $5,000 for your vehicle donation, the written acknowledgment from the charity must:
Identify the charity’s name, the date and location of the donation
Describe the vehicle
Include a statement as to whether the charity provided any goods or services in return for the car other than intangible religious benefits and, if so, a description and good faith estimate of the value of the goods and services
Identify your name and taxpayer identification number
Provide the vehicle identification number
The written acknowledgement generally must be provided to you within 30 days of the sale of the vehicle. Alternatively, the charitable organization may in certain cases, provide you a completed Form 1098-C, Contributions of Motor Vehicles, Boats, and Airplanes, that contains the same information.
The written acknowledgment requirements for claiming a deduction under $500 or over $5,000 are similar to the ones described above but there are some differences. For example, if your deduction is expected to be more than $5,000 and not limited to the gross proceeds from the sale of your used vehicle, you must obtain a written appraisal of the vehicle. Our office can help guide you through the many steps of donating a vehicle valued at more than $5,000.
If you are planning to donate a used vehicle, please contact our office and we can discuss the tax rules in more detail.
Lawmakers have departed Washington to campaign before the November 6 elections and left undone is a long list of unfinished tax business. In many ways, the last quarter of 2012 is similar to 2010, when Congress and the White House waited until the eleventh hour to extend expiring tax cuts. Like 2010, a host of individual and business tax incentives are scheduled to expire. Unlike 2010, lawmakers are confronted with massive across-the-board spending cuts scheduled to take effect in 2013.
Lawmakers have departed Washington to campaign before the November 6 elections and left undone is a long list of unfinished tax business. In many ways, the last quarter of 2012 is similar to 2010, when Congress and the White House waited until the eleventh hour to extend expiring tax cuts. Like 2010, a host of individual and business tax incentives are scheduled to expire. Unlike 2010, lawmakers are confronted with massive across-the-board spending cuts scheduled to take effect in 2013.
Unfinished business
Since the start of 2012, the list of tax measures waiting for Congressional action has remained unchanged. Among the individual tax provisions scheduled to expire after 2012 are:
Reduced individual income tax rates
Reduced capital gains and dividend tax rates
Temporary repeal of the limitation on itemized deductions and the personal exemption phaseout for higher income taxpayers
Reduced estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer tax rates
Enhancements to many education tax incentives, such as the American Opportunity Tax Credit, Coverdell education savings accounts, and more.
Also scheduled to expire at the end of 2012 is the payroll tax holiday. The employee share of Social Security taxes is 4.2 percent rather than 6.2 percent, up to the Social Security earnings cap of $110,100 for 2012. Self-employed individuals benefit from a similar reduction.
Additionally, many so-called tax extenders for individuals expired after 2011. They include the state and local sales tax deduction, the teachers' classroom expense deduction, and more. The most recent alternative minimum tax (AMT) "patch" expired after 2011.
The list of expiring or expired tax incentives for businesses is just as long. They include:
Enhanced Code Sec. 179 expensing (after 2012)
100 percent bonus depreciation (generally after 2011)
50 percent bonus depreciation (generally after 2012)
Research tax credit (after 2011)
Production tax credit for wind energy (after 2012)
Enhanced Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) for veterans (after 2012)
Regular WOTC (after 2011)
A lengthy laundry list of business tax extenders, such as special expensing rules for television and film productions, the Indian employment credit, and more (after 2011).
Along with all of the expiring provisions are even more pending proposals. They include proposals by the White House to enact tax incentives to encourage employers to hire long-term unemployed individuals, impose a minimum tax on overseas profits and more. The likelihood of any of these proposals being enacted before year-end is slim, but they could be revisited in 2013 depending on the outcome of the November elections. Comprehensive tax reform, including any reduction in the individual tax rates below their 2012 levels and a reduction in the corporate tax rate, is also expected to wait until 2013 or beyond.
Behind the scenes talks
The lame-duck Congress, which will meet after the November elections, may tackle some or all of the expiring tax incentives, or it could do nothing and punt them to the next Congress. Behind the scenes, some Democrats and Republicans in Congress are reportedly talking about a short-term extension of the expiring/expired provisions, for six months or one year, which would give lawmakers and the White House more time to reach an overall agreement. However, the dynamic could and likely will change if the GOP takes the White House and wins control of the Senate.
In the Senate, Sen. Kent Conrad, D-ND, has told reporters that he and several other senators from both parties have been discussing whether or not to extend the expiring tax cuts. Conrad, who is retiring at the end of 2012, has acknowledged that Democrats and Republicans are far apart on revenue raisers and spending cuts. Reports of informal talks among the members of the House Ways and Means Committee have also circulated but no concrete proposals have so far been revealed.
Sequestration
The imminent spending cuts (called sequestration) are the result of the Budget Control Act of 2011. The 2011 Act imposes approximately $110 billion in spending cuts, impacting defense and non-defense spending, for 2013. Almost every area of federal spending, including tax enforcement, will be affected.
In recent months, some lawmakers have proposed to mitigate the spending cuts by raising revenues elsewhere. One area targeted for tax increases is the oil and gas industry. However, several attempts to repeal tax preferences for the oil and gas industry failed in Congress in 2012.
Any extension of the expiring tax breaks will have to take into account the looming across-the-board spending cuts. Tax reform and debt reduction will go hand-in-hand. However, it is unclear if debt reduction will drive tax reform or vice-versa. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
Please contact our office if you have any questions about pending federal tax legislation.
In 2013, a new and unique tax will take effect—a 3.8 percent "unearned income Medicare contribution" tax as part of the structure in place to pay for health care reform. The tax will be imposed on the "net investment income" (NII) of individuals, estates, and trusts that exceeds specified thresholds. The tax will generally fall on passive income, but will also apply generally to capital gains from the disposition of property.
In 2013, a new and unique tax will take effect—a 3.8 percent "unearned income Medicare contribution" tax as part of the structure in place to pay for health care reform. The tax will be imposed on the "net investment income" (NII) of individuals, estates, and trusts that exceeds specified thresholds. The tax will generally fall on passive income, but will also apply generally to capital gains from the disposition of property.
Specified thresholds
For an individual, the tax will apply to the lesser of the taxpayer's NII, or the amount of "modified" adjusted gross income (AGI with foreign income added back) above a specified threshold, which is:
$250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly and a surviving spouse;
$125,000 for married taxpayers filing separately;
$200,000 for single and head of household taxpayers.
Examples. A single taxpayer has modified AGI of $220,000, including NII of $30,000. The tax applies to the lesser of $30,000 or ($220,000 minus $200,000), the specified threshold for single taxpayers. Thus, the tax applies to $20,000.
A single taxpayer has modified AGI of $150,000, including $60,000 of NII. Because the taxpayer's income is below the $200,000 threshold, the taxpayer does not owe the tax, despite having substantial NII.
For an estate or trust, the tax applies to the lesser of undistributed net income, or the excess of AGI over the dollar amount for the highest tax rate bracket for estates and trusts ($11,950 for 2013). Thus, the tax applies to a much lower amount for trusts and estates.
Application of tax
The tax applies to interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, and rents, and capital gains, unless derived from a trade or business. The tax also applies to income and gains from a passive trade or business.
Other items are excluded from NII and from the tax: distributions from IRAs, pensions, 401(k) plans, tax-sheltered annuities, and eligible 457 plans, for example. Items that are totally excluded from gross income, such as distributions from a Roth IRA and interest on tax-exempt bonds, are excluded both from NII and from modified AGI.
The tax does not apply to nonresident aliens, charitable trusts, or corporations.
Tax planning techniques
Taxpayers are concerned about having to pay the tax. One technique for avoiding the tax is to sell off capital gain property in 2012, before the tax applies. This can be particularly useful if the taxpayer is facing a large capital gain from the sale of a principal residence (after taking the $250,000/$500,000 exclusion from income). Older taxpayers who do not want to sell their property may want to consider holding on to appreciated property until death, when the property gets a fair market value basis without being subject to income tax.
The technique of "gain harvesting" may be even more attractive if tax rates increase on dividends, capital gains, and AGI in 2013, with the potential expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts. However, the status of these tax rates will not be determined until after the election, potentially in a lame-duck Congressional session. It is also possible that Congress will simply extend existing tax rates for another year and "punt" the decision until 2013, as tax reform discussions heat up.
Taxpayers may also want to change the source of their income. Investing in tax-exempt bonds will be more attractive, since the interest income does not enter into AGI or NII. Converting a 401(k) account or traditional IRA to a Roth IRA will accomplish the same purpose. Income from a Roth conversion is not net investment income, although the income will increase modified AGI, which may put other income in danger of being subject to the 3.8 percent tax. Increasing deductible or pre-tax contributions to existing retirement plans can also lower income and help the taxpayer stay below the applicable threshold.
Trusts and estates should make a point of distributing their income to their beneficiaries. A trust's NII will be taxed at a low threshold (less than $12,000), while the income received by a beneficiary is taxed only if the much higher $200,000/$250,000 thresholds are exceeded.
Uncertainty
There was some uncertainty about the tax taking effect because of litigation challenging the health care law providing the tax, but a June 2012 Supreme Court decision upheld the law. The application of the tax is also uncertain because the Republican leadership has vowed to pursue repeal of the health care law if the Republicans win the presidency and take control of both houses of Congress in the November 2012 elections. But this is speculative. In the meantime, the Supreme Court decision guarantees that the tax will take effect on January 1, 2013.
These can be difficult decisions. While economic considerations for managing assets and income are important, it also makes sense for a taxpayer to look at the tax impact if the certain asset sales or shifts in investment portfolios are otherwise being considered.
Taxpayers recovering from the current economic downturn will get at least some relief in 2013 by way of the mandatory upward inflation-adjustments called for under the tax code, according to CCH, a Wolters Kluwer business. CCH has released estimated income ranges for each 2013 tax bracket as well as a growing number of other inflation-sensitive tax figures, such as the personal exemption and the standard deduction.
Taxpayers recovering from the current economic downturn will get at least some relief in 2013 by way of the mandatory upward inflation-adjustments called for under the tax code, according to CCH, a Wolters Kluwer business. CCH has released estimated income ranges for each 2013 tax bracket as well as a growing number of other inflation-sensitive tax figures, such as the personal exemption and the standard deduction.
Projections this year, however, are clouded by the uncertainty of expiring provisions in the tax code. If Congress allows the so-called Bush-era tax cuts to expire at the end of 2012, many taxpayers could lose more ground than they will otherwise gain. These tax cuts, first enacted within Economic Growth Tax Recovery and Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) with a ten-year life, were last extended by the 2010 Tax Relief Act, but only for two years through 2012.
When there is inflation, indexing of brackets lowers tax bills by including more of taxpayers' incomes in lower brackets – in the existing 15-percent rather than the existing 25-percent bracket, for example. The formula used in indexing showed an average amount of inflation this year of about 2.5 percent – the highest in several years. Most 2013 figures therefore have moved higher.
Tax Rates
The current 10, 15, 25, 33 and 35-percent rates are now officially scheduled to sunset to the pre-EGTRRA rate structure of 15, 28, 31, 36 and 39.6-percent. While no one in Washington is calling for a full sunset of all the current tax rates, congressional gridlock might produce a cliffhanger on what will happen until after the November elections, and perhaps not even before January when the new, 113th Congress convenes. In the meantime, there are three possible alternative scenarios being debated by lawmakers:
Extend the current tax bracket structure in its entirety;
As proposed by President Obama, keep the current rate structure except revive the 36 and 39.6-percent rates, starting at a higher-income bracket level of $200,000 for single filers, $250,000 for joint filers, $225,000 for head-of-households and $125,000 for married taxpayers filing separately, also indexed for inflation since initially proposed in 2009 but keyed to adjusted gross income (AGI) rather than taxable income (indexed 2013 projections for those AGI levels, based on the Administration's FY 2013 Budget, are $213,200 / $266,500 / $239,850 / and $133,250, respectively); or
As proposed by certain Senate Democrats, raise the top tax rate only for individuals making more than $1 million.
Tax Brackets
Here is a sample of how inflation will raise rate brackets in 2013, assuming a full extension of tax rates:
Joint returns. For married taxpayers filing jointly and surviving spouses, the maximum taxable income subject to the 10-percent bracket will rise from $17,400 in 2012, to $17,850 in 2013; the top of the 15-percent tax bracket will increase from $70,700 to $72,500. The bracket amounts for the remaining tax rates will show similarly proportionate increases: $146,400 as the maximum for the 25-percent bracket (up $3,700 from 2012); $223,050 for the 28-percent bracket (up $5,600 from 2012); and $398,350 for the 33-percent bracket (up $10,000 from 2012). Amounts above the $398,350 level will be taxed at the 35-percent rate.
Single filers. For single taxpayers, the maximum taxable income for the 10-percent bracket will increase to $8,925 for 2012 (up from $8,700 in 2012). The remainder of the rate brackets show inflation increases of: $900 for the top of the 15-percent bracket (to $36,250); $2,200 for the 25-percent bracket (to $87,850); $4,600 for the 28-percent bracket (to $183,250); and $10,000 for the top of the 33-percent bracket (to $398,350).
Standard Deductions
The 2013 standard deduction will increase for all taxpayers. The standard deduction amounts for 2013 is projected to be $6,100 for single taxpayers; $8,950 for heads of households; $12,200 for married taxpayers filing jointly and surviving spouses; and $6,100 for married taxpayers filing separately. The standard deduction for dependents rises $50 to $1,000 (or earned income plus $350). The additional standard deduction for those have reached 65 or are blind will rise to $1,200 for married taxpayers; $1,500 for unmarried individuals.
Personal Exemptions
The amount of personal and dependency exemptions for 2013 will increase to $3,900 from the 2012 level of $3,800.
Gift Tax Exclusion
The gift tax annual exclusion, which rose from a base of $10,000 to $11,000 in 2002; $12,000 in 2006, and $13,000 in 2009, once again will rise in 2013 to $14,000. Pursuant to the IRC, the exemption can rise only when the inflation adjustment produces an increase of $1,000 or more.
Some individuals must pay estimated taxes or face a penalty in the form of interest on the amount underpaid. Self-employed persons, retirees, and nonworking individuals most often must pay estimated taxes to avoid the penalty. But an employee may need to pay them if the amount of tax withheld from wages is insufficient to cover the tax owed on other income. The potential tax owed on investment income also may increase the need for paying estimated tax, even among wage earners.
Some individuals must pay estimated taxes or face a penalty in the form of interest on the amount underpaid. Self-employed persons, retirees, and nonworking individuals most often must pay estimated taxes to avoid the penalty. But an employee may need to pay them if the amount of tax withheld from wages is insufficient to cover the tax owed on other income. The potential tax owed on investment income also may increase the need for paying estimated tax, even among wage earners.
The trick with estimated taxes is to pay a sufficient amount of estimated tax to avoid a penalty but not to overpay. The IRS will refund the overpayment when you file your return, but it will not pay interest on it. In other words, by overpaying tax to the IRS, you are in essence choosing to give the government an interest-free loan rather than invest your money somewhere else and make a profit.
When do I make estimated tax payments?
Individual estimated tax payments are generally made in four installments accompanying a completed Form 1040-ES, Estimated Tax for Individuals. For the typical individual who uses a calendar tax year, payments generally are due on April 15, June 15, and September 15 of the tax year, and January 15 of the following year (or the following business day when it falls on a weekend or other holiday).
Am I required to make estimated tax payments?
Generally, you must pay estimated taxes in 2012 if (1) you expect to owe at least $1,000 in tax after subtracting tax withholding (if you have any) and (2) you expect your withholding and credits to be less than the smaller of 90 percent of your 2012 taxes or 100 percent of the tax on your 2011 return. There are special rules for higher income individuals.
Usually, there is no penalty if your estimated tax payments plus other tax payments, such as wage withholding, equal either 100 percent of your prior year's tax liability or 90 percent of your current year's tax liability. However, if your adjusted gross income for your prior year exceeded $150,000, you must pay either 110 percent of the prior year tax or 90 percent of the current year tax to avoid the estimated tax penalty. For married filing separately, the higher payments apply at $75,000.
Estimated tax is not limited to income tax. In figuring your installments, you must also take into account other taxes such as the alternative minimum tax, penalties for early withdrawals from an IRA or other retirement plan, and self-employment tax, which is the equivalent of Social Security taxes for the self-employed.
Suppose I owe only a relatively small amount of tax?
There is no penalty if the tax underpayment for the year is less than $1,000. However, once an underpayment exceeds $1,000, the penalty applies to the full amount of the underpayment.
What if I realize I have miscalculated my tax before the year ends?
An employee may be able to avoid the penalty by getting the employer to increase withholding in an amount needed to cover the shortfall. The IRS will treat the withheld tax as being paid proportionately over the course of the year, even though a greater amount was withheld at year-end. The proportionate treatment could prevent penalties on installments paid earlier in the year.
What else can I do?
If you receive income unevenly over the course of the year, you may benefit from using the annualized income installment method of paying estimated tax. Under this method, your adjusted gross income, self-employment income and alternative minimum taxable income at the end of each quarterly tax payment period are projected forward for the entire year. Estimated tax is paid based on these annualized amounts if the payment is lower than the regular estimated payment. Any decrease in the amount of an estimated tax payment caused by using the annualized installment method must be added back to the next regular estimated tax payment.
Determining estimated taxes can be complicated, but the penalty can be avoided with proper attention. This office stands ready to assist you with this determination. Please contact us if we can help you determine whether you owe estimated taxes.
In light of the IRS’s new Voluntary Worker Classification Settlement Program (VCSP), which it announced this fall, the distinction between independent contractors and employees has become a “hot issue” for many businesses. The IRS has devoted considerable effort to rectifying worker misclassification in the past, and continues the trend with this new program. It is available to employers that have misclassified employees as independent contractors and wish to voluntarily rectify the situation before the IRS or Department of Labor initiates an examination.
In light of the IRS’s new Voluntary Worker Classification Settlement Program (VCSP), which it announced this fall, the distinction between independent contractors and employees has become a “hot issue” for many businesses. The IRS has devoted considerable effort to rectifying worker misclassification in the past, and continues the trend with this new program. It is available to employers that have misclassified employees as independent contractors and wish to voluntarily rectify the situation before the IRS or Department of Labor initiates an examination.
The distinction between independent contractors and employees is significant for employers, especially when they file their federal tax returns. While employers owe only the payment to independent contractors, employers owe employees a series of federal payroll taxes, including Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment, and federal tax withholding. Thus, it is often tempting for employers to avoid these taxes by classifying their workers as independent contractors rather than employees.
If, however, the IRS discovers this misclassification, the consequences might include not only the requirement that the employer pay all owed payroll taxes, but also hefty penalties. It is important that employers be aware of the risk they take by classifying a worker who should or could be an employee as an independent contractor.
“All the facts and circumstances”
The IRS considers all the facts and circumstances of the parties in determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. These are numerous and sometimes confusing, but in short summary, the IRS traditionally considers 20 factors, which can be categorized according to three aspects: (1) behavioral control; (2) financial control; (3) and the relationship of the parties.
Examples of behavioral and financial factors that tend to indicate a worker is an employee include:
The worker is required to comply with instructions about when, where, and how to work;
The worker is trained by an experienced employee, indicating the employer wants services performed in a particular manner;
The worker’s hours are set by the employer;
The worker must submit regular oral or written reports to the employer;
The worker is paid by the hour, week, or month;
The worker receives payment or reimbursement from the employer for his or her business and traveling expenses; and
The worker has the right to end the employment relationship at any time without incurring liability.
In other words, any existing facts or circumstances that point to an employer’s having more behavioral and/or financial control over the worker tip the balance towards classifying that worker as an employee rather than a contractor. The IRS’s factors do not always apply, however; and if one or several factors indicate independent contractor status, but more indicate the worker is an employee, the IRS may still determine the worker is an employee.
Finally, in examining the relationship of the parties, benefits, permanency of the employment term, and issuance of a Form W-2 rather than a Form 1099 are some indicators that the relationship is that of an employer–employee.
Conclusion
Worker classification is fact-sensitive, and the IRS may see a worker you may label an independent contractor in a very different light. One key point to remember is that the IRS generally frowns on independent contractors and actively looks for factors that indicate employee status.
Please do not hesitate to call our offices if you would like a reassessment of how you are currently classifying workers in your business, as well as an evaluation of whether IRS’s new Voluntary Classification Program may be worth investigating.
Job-hunting expenses are generally deductible as long as you are not searching for a job in a new field. This tax benefit can be particularly useful in a tough job market. It does not matter whether your job hunt is successful, or whether you are employed or unemployed when you are looking.
Job-hunting expenses are generally deductible as long as you are not searching for a job in a new field. This tax benefit can be particularly useful in a tough job market. It does not matter whether your job hunt is successful, or whether you are employed or unemployed when you are looking.
Expenses directly connected with a job search are deductible as a miscellaneous itemized deduction. You can deduct job-hunting expenses if the amount of all your so-called miscellaneous itemized deductions exceeds two percent of your adjusted gross income. However, if you claim the standard deduction, you cannot deduct job-hunting expenses. Therefore, as a practical matter for many job seekers, job hunting expenses do not materialize as a tax deduction.
For those who are able to use job seeking expenses as a deduction, it can be difficult to determine what a new field is. A professional photographer who pursues a job in the retail industry clearly is searching in a new field and cannot deduct any of his or her job-hunting expenses. But there are exceptions. The IRS has allowed persons who retired from the military to search for jobs in new fields and claim their job-hunting expenses. Taking a temporary job while searching for permanent employment in your current field will not be considered a job change that disqualifies your job-hunting expenses.
Persons entering the job market for the first time, such as college students, and persons who have been out of the job market for a long period of time, such as parents of young children, cannot deduct their job-hunting expenses. However, a college student who worked in a particular field while in school may be able to deduct job-hunting expenses.
Deductible expenses include typing, printing and mailing a resume. Long-distance phone calls are also deductible. You can deduct travel costs for going on a job search or an interview, including air transportation, railroad, or car expenses. The standard rate for car expenses for business is 55 cents per mile for 2012. Amounts you pay to a job counselor, employment agency or job referral service are all deductible.
It is important to keep records of your costs. While your individual expenses may not be substantial, your total expenses can add up to a significant amount.